The Acoustic Toll

For Caitlin and Jarrett Winders, residents of Old Cove Road in Salina, the concept of home has begun to erode, replaced by a relentless sonic invasion that they argue is threatening their family’s well-being. What was once a sanctuary is now a front line in a burgeoning regulatory and legal battle against Sharkey’s, a local bar operating under the corporate entity Land of Nichols LD, LLC. The conflict, which has spilled into the public forums of the Clay Town Board and the Planning Board, highlights the friction between local commerce and residential preservation, a clash now amplified by the cry of a newborn infant.

The Winders have brought their grievances directly to the town leadership, painting a picture of an environment where peace is a luxury they can no longer afford. During an October 6, 2025 Town Board meeting, Caitlin Winders laid bare the severity of the situation, noting that the noise levels have escalated beyond a mere nuisance. The couple, adjusting to life with a one-month-old baby, has been forced to vacate their own home on multiple occasions simply to find the silence necessary for sleep and basic family functioning [1]. The testimony revealed a schedule of noise that is as aggressive as it is expansive, turning their evenings and weekends into a marathon of unwanted sound.

A Week of Sound

The specifics of the disturbance, as cataloged by the residents, suggest an operation that has grown far beyond the parameters of a quiet local watering hole. According to the Winders’ address to the Board, the auditory assault follows a rigorous, nearly unbroken schedule throughout the week. The disruptions begin on Thursdays, with concerts running from 5:00 PM to 10:00 PM [1]. This is merely the preamble to the weekend.

As the work week concludes, the volume and duration increase. On Fridays, the music spans from 4:00 PM to 10:30 PM, a six-and-a-half-hour engagement [1]. Saturdays offer no reprieve, with the entertainment stretching from 3:00 PM in the afternoon until 10:30 PM at night [1]. Perhaps most intrusive for residents seeking a quiet weekend, the performances continue into Sunday, commencing at 8:00 AM and persisting until 11:00 PM [1]. The Winders further noted that these scheduled hours do not account for the sound checks that precede the events, adding to the cumulative noise pollution infiltrating their home [1].

The Bureaucratic Pause

As the Winders rally for relief, the bureaucratic machinery tasked with overseeing Sharkey’s operations has hit a significant slowdown. The crux of the current legal and planning standoff centers on Case #2025-052, involving James Nichols and Land of Nichols LD, LLC [4]. This case, which is vital to the future operation of the bar, has effectively been placed in a state of suspended animation.

During the November 19, 2025 Planning Board meeting, a formal motion was made by Ms. Guinup to adjourn the Sharkey's case [4]. The adjournment pushes the critical date to February 11, 2026, leaving the status of the bar's applications in limbo for months [4]. This procedural move is not merely a delay; it is a symptom of a broader, more complex legal entanglement. The repeated adjournments of this Planning Board case are inextricably tied to ongoing court proceedings [5]. While the specifics of the litigation remain referenced but not detailed in the public record, the connection is clear: the town's planning ability is currently handcuffed by the judicial system.

A Plea for Consideration

Caught in the gap between the Planning Board’s forced recess and the Town Board’s concern, the residents continue to advocate for intervention. Caitlin Winders is acutely aware that the ultimate resolution may lie beyond the会议室 (meeting room) and within the court walls. During her October address, she explicitly acknowledged that she is aware of the court proceedings involving the establishment [1]. However, she viewed the Town Board's upcoming decision on Sharkey’s application as a crucial pivot point.

With a respectful but firm tone, she requested that the Town Board weigh the documented experiences of her family heavily when deliberating on the bar's application [1]. The implication was that the Board had the power—and arguably the duty—to consider the noise impacts on residents with a newborn before rendering a decision on the establishment's future.

Town Response and Continued Advocacy

The Town Board's response has been cautious, acknowledging the complaints while navigating the complexities of enforcement. By the October 20, 2025 meeting, the Winders' plight had evidently reached the desk of Deputy Supervisor Bick. During the proceedings, Bick inquired about the presence of the couple who had lodged the complaints [2]. His commentary suggested that the administration was not passive in the face of these concerns; he explained that the town had indeed followed up on the issues raised by the residents [2].

Yet, "following up" appears to be distinct from "resolving." The Winders returned to the podium on November 17, 2025, indicating that the problem persisted despite any administrative efforts. At this meeting, the couple spoke again on the ongoing noise issues at Sharkey's [3]. This time, they escalated their method of delivery, reading a letter that detailed their "dilemma" [3]. The use of the word "dilemma" underscores the entrapment they feel—caught between a home they cannot enjoy and a legal process that moves at a glacial pace.

The Waiting Game

As the calendar turns toward 2026, the stalemate continues. The Winders remain on Old Cove Road, presumably still navigating the schedule of 8:00 AM Sunday sound checks and late-night Friday concerts. The Planning Board’s next move is delayed until February 11, 2026 [4], waiting for the fog of the court proceedings to clear [5].

In the interim, the noise remains louder than ever [1], a constant reminder to the Winders that while the law moves slowly, the music plays on. The residents' request for consideration remains the focal point of their advocacy, a plea for the town to prioritize the sleep of a newborn and the peace of a neighborhood over the continuation of a business model that they argue has overstepped its bounds. For now, the battle for silence in Clay is being fought in adjournments and footnotes, with the residents waiting for a turn in the music that has yet to come.

***

Sources

[1] Town of Clay Meeting Minutes, October 6, 2025. "Caitlin and Jarrett Winders of Old Cove Road in Salina gave an update on the noise situation from Sharkeys... Caitlin began by saying the noise is louder than ever, they now have a 1-month-old baby and have had to find other places to stay to get sleep... concerts are Thursdays from 5-10 PM, Fridays from 4-10:30, Saturdays from 3-10:30 and Sunday from 8 AM to 11 PM, with sound checks before... respectfully requested that the Town Board takes this information into consideration when deciding on Sharkeys application."

[2] Town of Clay Meeting Minutes, October 20, 2025. "Deputy Supervisor Bick asked if the couple that complained about the noise at Sharkey's were present. He explained that the [town followed up on their concerns]."

[3] Town of Clay Meeting Minutes, November 17, 2025. "Caitlyn and Jarrett Winders spoke on the ongoing noise issues at Sharkey's, reading a letter about their dilemma."

[4] Town of Clay Planning Board Minutes, November 19, 2025. "Motion made by Ms. Guinup to adjourn Case #2025-052 James Nichols/Land of Nichols LD, LLC (Sharkey's) to February 11, 2026."

[5] Source Material Notes. "Sharkey's has a pending Planning Board case that has been adjourned repeatedly. The case is tied to court proceedings."